1. Federal Constitutional Framework & The Commercial Speech Doctrine
The national framework governing credit card surcharges rests on a pivotal intersection of federal antitrust litigation, commercial speech protections under the First Amendment, and card network operating rules. In the landmark Supreme Court decision in Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman (2017), the Court evaluated state laws that allowed cash discounts while criminalizing credit card surcharges.
Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Roberts held that statutory bans regulating how prices are communicated to consumers regulate speech, not conduct. Following this precedent, federal circuit courts struck down anti-surcharge statutes in California (Ninth Circuit), Florida (Eleventh Circuit), and Texas (Fifth Circuit). Consequently, modern state regulation cannot broadly criminalize surcharges, but instead focuses on preventing deceptive pricing and enforcing transparent upfront dual-dollar disclosures.